the end of the book.
54. Like the Parkers, the Wirthlin plaintiffs are devout Judeo-Christians. Included in their
core Judeo-Christian beliefs is the concept that issues pertaining to sexual intimacy,
procreation, human sexuality, and the holy basis of matrimony should remain private
within families, be introduced by parents, and governed by the laws of the God of
Abraham. Also included is the concept that homosexual behavior is immoral in that it
violates God's law.
55. This theme of romantic physical contact between two men is not one that the Wirthlins
wish to have celebrated and affirmed to their young, seven-year-old son, because it is in
contravention of their sincerely and deeply-held faith.
56. On information and belief, the defendant Ms. Kramer knew or should have known that
reading King and King would be in direct contravention of the deeply-held faith of the
Wirthlins and possibly others. On information and belief, Ms. Kramer selected King and
King; to read to the students for the express purpose of indoctrinating them into the
concept that homosexuality and marriage between same-sex partners is moral. In so
doing, she consciously intended to intrude upon the Wirthlins' right to direct the moral
upbringing of their own children.
57. The evening of the reading, _____ returned home and was agitated. He told his parents
about the book, which he described as "so silly."
58. The Wirthlins then sent an email to Ms. Kramer, and requested clarification. Ms. Kramer
telephoned them on Monday, March 27, 2006, confirming the book had been read, and
told them the name of the book.
59. On March 30, 2006, the Wirthlins attended a previously scheduled parent-teacher